Monday, May 23, 2005
Journalism?
I watch Paul Holmes on Prime because I try to watch as little as possible of the propaganda channel. And Campbell on 3 is very annoying. But tonight I question the future of Holmes' current affairs show.
There was a story on a man called Payne who was complaining about the Family Court and how nine years after he had an agreement with his wife over relationship property division the Court is yet to carry it through by an order transfering the family home to his name.
The problem is we never got to hear why the Court hasn't made the order. I was waiting for this punchline. You know, what the Court said about why he can't get the house after he has paid the money. What the issues are. Yet all we got was him blabbing on about how the Judges are corrupt blah blah blah. Then the story ended. AAARRGGHHHH!
It was terribly poor, amateurish and almost seemed rushed. Holmes will have to do better to keep me as a viewer.
There was a story on a man called Payne who was complaining about the Family Court and how nine years after he had an agreement with his wife over relationship property division the Court is yet to carry it through by an order transfering the family home to his name.
The problem is we never got to hear why the Court hasn't made the order. I was waiting for this punchline. You know, what the Court said about why he can't get the house after he has paid the money. What the issues are. Yet all we got was him blabbing on about how the Judges are corrupt blah blah blah. Then the story ended. AAARRGGHHHH!
It was terribly poor, amateurish and almost seemed rushed. Holmes will have to do better to keep me as a viewer.
